Mother of all Wars

Found a link to an article describing this from a commenter on J. Robb's site. Why don't they just go ahead and say what "it" is, it isn't "sort of a mother of all wars." "It" is WW-III, and "it" has been going on for at least the last 10-15 yrs. And "it" is, the first world v. the third. And finally, this mother of all wars, is unlikely to ever end, unless of course humankind ends. "It" is the ultimate have versus have nots. Ins versus outs. Victory only means a changing of sides.

More on this from John Robb here. When will American politicians start talking about "it"?